shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
shape
20 February 2023 / Scott J. Best

New Jersey Judge Shortage Affects Civil Trials

On February 7, 2023, New Jersey Chief Justice Stuart Rabner suspended all trials in the Civil Division and matrimonial trials for the immediate future in two vicinages, comprised of six New Jersey counties due to the significant judge shortage the court system is facing. Due to the shortage, the courts are prioritizing proceedings that are emergencies, are time sensitive, or an individual’s liberty is at stake. The suspension will start on February 21, 2023, and applies to: Vicinage 13 which includes Hunterdon, Somerset, Warren; and Vicinage 15, which is comprised of Gloucester, Cumberland, and Salem counties.  

For those counties, there are currently 14 judicial vacancies out of a total of 48 judicial positions. There are currently 69 vacancies statewide for the trial courts. Over the last three years, the courts have operated with an average of more than 50 vacancies, and that problem was further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Since trial court judges in New Jersey are appointed, the burden is on the Executive and Legislative branches to address the crises and Justice Rabner called on them to do so. The statement noted that trials may be suspended in additional counties unless the situation is remedied.

By way of example, I was recently in one of the most populated counties in the state which is currently short eight judges, and currently has only two judges hearing civil cases. The judge shortage coupled with the COVID-19-related backlog in many counties has created a very difficult situation with some trials being pushed out 6-12 months from their originally scheduled date.  

We will continue to monitor the situation and will advise of any further developments. If you have questions with regard to this change, please contact attorney Scott Best at any time.

This blog is not a solicitation for business and it is not intended to constitute legal advice on specific matters, create an attorney-client relationship or be legally binding in any way.

Related News

Alerts / 10 July 2026

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Constitutional Limits on Tax Foreclosure Recoveries

Last year, Cleveland Shareholder Ben Hoen reported that the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Pung v. Isabella County, a Michigan tax foreclosure case that raised important questions concerning the constitutional rights of property owners following a tax foreclosure sale.
Read More
Insights / 30 June 2026

Ohio Court Confirms a Power of Attorney Cannot Use an Elderly Person's Money for Personal Expenses

A power of attorney is not permitted to treat an elderly person's money like a personal bank account. Ohio law recognizes that older adults are particularly vulnerable to abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation.
Read More
Insights / 30 June 2026

Rebutting Attacks on Alternate Service in Michigan - What Creditors Need To Know

Currently making the rounds on the internet are false motions to quash service/motions to dismiss based on alleged lack of service in Michigan cases, which debtors are filing with courts with increased frequency on a reflexive, mechanical basis. Detroit Attorney Jeffrey Bearss shares the following in response.
Read More

Join Our Email List

Get the latest articles and news delivered to your email inbox!
Subscribe

Contact Scott

Join Our Email List